![]() ![]() as mother's voice is broadcast from helicopters in desperate bid Time is running out for Emile: French police admit they 'have no clues' in hunt for missing boy, two, who has gone three days without food and water.Feline coronavirus kills 300,000 cats in Cyprus - and many more could die if the strain reaches Britain.Anger as pupils are tested about 'white privilege' with a report warning that schools are being taken over by organisations teaching 'anti-racism' theories.Prime Day 2023 UK LIVE: Best Amazon deals on everything from Ninja Air Fryers to Kindle Paperwhite.Manson family killer Leslie Van Houten, 73, is released from prison after serving 53 years of a life sentence following lengthy court battle for freedom.BBC presenter in '£35,000 sex pics scandal' is now accused of 'breaking lockdown rules to see stranger he met on dating site' as THIRD person comes forward claiming under siege star sent them cash and asked for a picture.It is especially alarming to see it happening in Hollywood.”įor her part, Wilde defended the film’s portrayal of events, telling THR on the red carpet of the Gotham Awards, “I have an immense amount of respect for Kathy Scruggs,” she said, later adding: “I think people have a hard time accepting sexuality in female characters without allowing it to entirely define that character. There is no evidence that this transaction ever happened.Īhead of the film’s AFI Fest premiere Kevin Riley, the current editor-in-chief of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, spoke to THR, saying, “At a time when journalism itself is under attack from a lot of corners, for a movie to fall into this kind of trope and reinforce a false stereotype - it is wrong. While they are never actually seen doing so, it is implied that they sleep together. What makes you think you could fuck it out of me?” Shaw does provide Jewell’s name to Scruggs, then asks if the two should get a hotel room or go back to her car. To this, Shaw replies, “Kathy, you couldn’t fuck it out of them. In the film, Scruggs is seen offering to sleep with FBI agent Tom Shaw (played by Jon Hamm) in exchange for information about the investigation. Dialogue and certain events and characters contained in the film were created for the purposes of dramatization.” The AJC’s claims are baseless and we will vigorously defend against them.”Ī disclaimer runs at the end of the film which states, “The film is based on actual historical events. ‘Richard Jewell’ focuses on the real victim, seeks to tell his story, confirm his innocence and restore his name. It is unfortunate and the ultimate irony that the Atlanta Journal Constitution, having been a part of the rush to judgment of Richard Jewell, is now trying to malign our filmmakers and cast. There is no disputing that Richard Jewell was an innocent man whose reputation and life were shredded by a miscarriage of justice. said, “The film is based on a wide range of highly credible source material. The legal letter was sent on behalf of the paper and its owner, Cox Enterprises. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution is being represented by Hollywood attorney Martin Singer, whose clients have included Brett Ratner and Jeff Bezos. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.” ![]() “We hereby demand that you immediately issue a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. “The Richard Jewell film falsely portrays the AJC and its personnel as extraordinarily reckless, using unprofessional and highly inappropriate reporting methods, and engaging in constitutional malice by recklessly disregarding information inconsistent with its planned reporting,” begins the letter addressed to Eastwood, screenwriter Bill Ray, journalist Marie Brenner (who wrote the Vanity Fair feature on which the film is based) and Warner Bros. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |